Mareh Makom · Love ·
Love: The journey to our lost half
Is love completion, or the recognition of an eternal lack?
Source: The myth of Aristophanes: when we were whole and split in two
"... then there was an androgynous kind, whose form and name were composed of two, male and female. In the past, human beings had a different shape... Every human figure was round, its back and chest like a sphere... and it had two faces on one round neck... and these two faces, which faced opposite directions, were connected on a single head. And they were terrible in their great power and might, and in their great pride they attacked the gods. Zeus wanted to punish them and said, 'I will split each one in two'... And since then, each of us is therefore only half of a human, and everyone is always seeking their matching half... Love is nothing but the name for the desire and pursuit of wholeness."
(Plato, The Symposium, Aristophanes' speech, Greece, 4th century BCE)
Explanation: The desperate search for the other half
In Plato's famous dialogue, the playwright Aristophanes presents a grotesque creation myth: human beings were once round creatures with four hands, four legs, and two faces. They were so powerful that they threatened the gods. Zeus, wanting to weaken them without destroying them, split them in two. Ever since, each person is only a "half," and love is nothing but the desperate, almost biological yearning to find the part severed from us in order to return to being a single whole.
Perspective: Love as a disability: when romance meets tragedy
Romance tells us that love is a gift, but Aristophanes reveals another possibility: love is a disability. It is not an "added value" to life, but evidence of a manufacturing defect. The person in love is not an altruist seeing the other; they are a narcissist who spends their whole life searching for someone to complete them. This pursuit is fundamentally tragic, because we can never truly fuse physically with another person. We are doomed to a life of endless friction, two broken shards trying to force their jagged edges together, calling that pain "passion." The history of divorce is simply the history of glue that failed to hold.
Going Deeper: Between psychological lack and free choice
The psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan took this idea one step further into the abyss. In his view, "love is offering ourselves to someone who wants precisely what we do not have." Love is founded on lack. We love in order to fill a void, but because the void is in the psyche rather than the body, no external person can ever truly fill it. Lacan contends that love is the illusion that a psychological hole can be plugged with a biological body.
By contrast, the Midrash (Genesis Rabbah 8) offers a perspective on Aristophanes's idea: God did not simply slice them apart, but "sawed" them apart and distanced them from each other. The critical difference from the Greek myth lies in the purpose: while in Plato the cut is a punishment and a source of weakness, in Judaism this sawing apart—the nesirah—is developmental. Only when they are separate and standing face to face (ezer kenegdo, a counterpart facing one another) can they choose love. Forced unity is meaningless; only separation enables the free choice to reconnect face to face.
Culture: The shrouded kiss: when intimacy remains out of reach
René Magritte's painting The Lovers (1928). A couple kisses with their heads shrouded in white cloth, so their lips never truly meet. This is the precise visual embodiment of the Platonic tragedy: intimacy constrained by blindness, a yearning for contact that remains forever blocked by the veil between ourselves and the other.