Mareh Makom · Forgiveness ·

Forgiveness: the journey of restitution that demands a price

Is forgiveness an inner feeling, or a legal contract that demands payment?

Source: The forgiveness protocol: three times, ten witnesses, and full detail

"Anyone who seeks forgiveness from his fellow should not ask him more than three times... And if he has died — he brings ten people, stands them by his grave, and says: 'I have sinned against the Lord, God of Israel, and against this person whom I have harmed'... Rav Hisda said: And he must specify the sin."

(Babylonian Talmud, Yoma 87a; and Bava Kamma 92a)

Explanation: The bureaucracy of atonement: why forgiveness is a technique, not a feeling

Contrary to the romantic notion of forgiveness as an inner epiphany, the Babylonian Talmud presents a dry, rigid legal procedure. Forgiveness is technical work: there is a required quota of attempts, a requirement of publicity, and an obligation to specify the deed. Forgiveness does not depend on the victim's feelings, but on the wrongdoer's effort. Inner intent is unknown; only the effort bears witness to it.

Perspective: Forgiveness without sweat is a bounced check

Forgiveness is not just a feeling; it is primarily a practice. The idea that you can ask for forgiveness in your heart, or in an email, is an invention of cowards who do not know how to ask for forgiveness, or how to receive it. Jewish law deliberately turns forgiveness into a bureaucracy: it demands sweat. Physically walking to the person, bringing witnesses, exposing the shame. Whoever wants pardon must pay in the currency of dignity and effort. If the offending party did not do the work, the injured party is not supposed to deliver the goods. Forgiveness without action and appeasement is a bounced check.

Going Deeper: The Reparations Agreement: when Germany tried to buy forgiveness with billions

In 1952, Moshe Sharett, Israel's foreign minister, signed an agreement known by its Hebrew name as the Reparations Agreement (Heskem HaShilumim), under which West Germany transferred to Israel, between 1953 and 1965, roughly 3 billion Deutsche Marks as compensation for the heavy burden placed on the State of Israel to resettle a large number of destitute Jewish refugees who were displaced and lost their property during the Holocaust. The Germans called the agreement Wiedergutmachung, meaning "making amends" or "restoring the good." Menachem Begin, head of the Herut party, along with the editorial boards of the newspapers Yedioth and Maariv, launched fierce protests against the agreement. One of the arguments was, of course, the concealment of the agreement's German name and its whitewashing under the name "reparations." From the German perspective, this was the beginning of forgiveness, bought with money.

Culture: Seven Pounds: when atonement demands life itself

In the film Seven Pounds, the protagonist, Ben Thomas (Will Smith), causes a fatal car crash that results in the deaths of seven people, including his fiancée. Not content with a verbal apology, he embarks on a calculated journey in which he donates parts of his body to save the lives of others. He gives his heart (literally) to a woman he fell in love with, thereby saving her life. This is the extreme model of forgiveness: you cannot ask for atonement without a price. Even repentance usually is not enough, and in the end, "Whoever says that the Holy One, blessed be He, lets things slide—his life shall be forfeit, as it is said: 'The Rock, His work is perfect, for all His ways are justice'" (Tractate Bava Kamma 50a).